Baby Names Meanings
Search 30,000 baby names. Find a unique name for your baby.





Your Ad Here






When Jane Sarkin, Vanity Fair's features editor, appeared on CBS's The Early Show this morning about the infamous Suri Cruise photo shoot , she revealed why it took so long for Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes to release photos of baby Suri and why they didn't just release photos to quiet rumors.

-Why did it take so long to show us the baby?
"The baby was born just as "Mission: Impossible III" was coming out. Tom was on this whirlwind press tower. He wanted to just get home, be with the baby, be with the children, his family and friends and they weren't really hiding the baby. They just didn't want to release a photo right way. They were always planning on it but then this whole controversy started, 'Where is Suri? Why are they hiding her?' They were not hiding anyone. In fact, they were always planning on releasing the picture."

-Why not just release a photo and end the rumors?
"When all the controversy started, they just didn't want to at that point.  They wanted to just stay home, take care of their family and then, finally, I called and called and called and they said, 'OK, can you come to Telluride next week?' And we went and we were so excited to be there."

Unfortunately, she did not mention why Tom and Katie have virtually sequestered the baby.

Source: CBS ShowBuzz


Posted on Sep 6, 06 at 12:00 PM in News | Link | Comments (9) | | Email this post

Your Comments

It sounds like what they're all trying to say is that there was no conspiracy to hide anything, they were just going about their lives.
That seems normal except for the fact that Katie mentions reading all the things that everyone was saying about them and being so hurt and the fact that they'd made such a show of themselves during the courtship/ pregnancy so it was silly to expect the general public to just ease off.

It seems like maybe there was no easy answer as to what to do, show her, don't show her, it's a lose/lose proposition anyway isn't it?

Posted by: ili175 at Sep 6, 2006 12:33:38 PM

That last comment of the post is the interesting part - the virtual seclusion. I think the situation just perpetuated itself; and quickly got out of hand. They weren't ready to release a photo yet which is perfectly understandable. But then the intense scrutiny just grew and grew....probably leaving them nervous to take the baby out. I don't care how large a security team they have - I'd be anxious too with such a flurry of activity constantly surrounding them.

Posted by: madison at Sep 6, 2006 5:27:13 PM

Correction: She was on Good Morning America with Diane Sawyer.

Posted by: Julie at Sep 6, 2006 6:28:38 PM

I have been a huge critic of Tom Cruise ever since he attacked Brooke Shields and I followed right along with the speculations when the "where's Suri?" drama began. HOWEVER, after reading the quotes from Katie Holmes I truly believe they have been trying to do what is best for their baby and family. I would be mortified if all that had been said about Suri was said about my daughter and I commend them for trying to give their baby a few "normal" months at the beginning of her life. I probably would have done the same thing if I were them. Well done, Katie and Tom!

Posted by: charsmom at Sep 6, 2006 8:50:08 PM

I think they did say why the baby was kept in "hiding".. Because the world was buzzing and creating rumors, and why feed the world when all theyve been doing in dogging you? I dont blame TomKat one bit for hiding that baby. Keep her out of the pap's eyes as long as possible.

Posted by: Stephanie at Sep 6, 2006 8:50:20 PM

if there is controversy, and we never saw her in public, i believe they were hiding her. i think its one thing to not release a press photo but still take the baby out, but its one thing to never take the baby out for three months just because of "controversy"

Posted by: natalie at Sep 6, 2006 9:11:53 PM

i also think that the only reason why they gave a photo was because the rumours were getting out of hand. i think they had no intention of ever releasing a photo based on past evidence.

Posted by: natalie at Sep 6, 2006 9:19:34 PM

the virtual seclusion.

Sorry, i'm Dutch. What does this sentence mean?
She does look adorable!

Posted by: kim at Sep 7, 2006 4:19:22 AM

Suri is their baby and they chose what they thought was best for her. They didn't have to release a photo of their child if they didn't want to.Who says that is mandatory. Being celebrities doesn't mean that you are obligated to let the world in on your personal life and/or that you must show your baby's photo immediately after birth. If I was a celebrity I wouldn't want my kid to be recognized all over the world or stalked by all of the paparazzi either. When celebrities release photos like that they are making their kids even bigger targets for kidnappers and obsessed fans who want a piece. It makes it easier, because they now know what they look like. Now the kids will have stalkers. Anyways, i would have done the same thing they did.

Posted by: angie at Sep 7, 2006 11:31:33 PM

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the site staff has approved them.

The following types of comments will not be posted:

  • anything that insults the CBB staff, CBB readers or celebrities. In general, a comment that includes "I'm sorry but..." or "She's cute but..." tend to be negative and/or insulting.
  • any type of discrimination in the discussions, including but not limited to racism, heterosexism, classism, religious bigotry, or discrimination toward the disabled.
  • We will not host discussions that involve explicit sexual references and are cautious about discussions on volatile topics such as abortion, religion, and race.
  • inflammatory remarks (intentional or otherwise), anything that we believe may provoke a fight.
  • advertising and spam.
  • off-topic and completely unrelated to the post.

Feel free to agree or disagree with each other as long as you do it respectfully. Please remember that there are people on the other end reading what you write. Celebrities do read the site, but so do regular people, and we all have our own experiences and perspectives. Please be respectful of that.

Bottom line: Ask yourself, "Would I be comfortable saying this to the person's face?" If you're not sure, then don't post it.

If you have a question that you would like the staff to answer, please email questionsATcelebrity-babies.com (replace AT with @). Due to sheer volume of the number of questions asked, we cannot respond to questions asked in the comment section.

Are you familiar with our site ground rules?


Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

URL: